Ken Krogue

An outstanding article by Propelling Brands’ Adam Needles discussed the fact that according to SirusDecisions, less than 10 percent of B2B businesses have successfully redefined the necessary role of high-impact lead generation and lead nurturing that will be required in 2010 and beyond.

I don’t want to steal his thunder, so go read the article, but the major point is that over the past 10 years, the roles of sales, marketing, lead generation, and lead nurturing have consistently become more holistic.

Sales managers are recognizing that they HAVE to have usable, critical intelligence data about how marketing is getting them their leads—and vice-versa, marketing managers are realizing that their efforts have to line up from Day 1 with what sales is trying to accomplish.

Every marketing and sales touch point is becoming increasingly attached and interactive with a half-dozen other touch points along the way—and for businesses to really get what they need out of their marketing spend, it has to be this way.

Trish Bertuzzi and The Bridge Group provided a set of data that added some weight to this assertion. Their survey of 115 companies indicated that dedicated lead generation/lead nurturing employees have nearly doubled in the last three years, and that there’s increasingly a split—almost exactly 50/50—of which department lead gen reports to, sales or marketing.

While there will never be a total overlap between sales and marketing, I don’t think the time is far distant that we may see the development of a new, hybrid department that works as an intermediary between the two. The “Market Oversight” department, or “Sales Analytics” department, will have the specific role of measuring, testing, and developing the ways in which sales and marketing will combine their efforts.

As a C-level manager for my company, I get pitched on new technology products a lot.

Now obviously I’m a big believer in the power of technology to transform inside sales and marketing processes. When I started 20 years ago as a sales manager at then Franklin Quest (now Franklin-Covey), the coolest technology on the market at the time was a fax machine.

Now we have CRM, dialers, sales force automation, automated email and drip campaigns, iPhones in every pocket, streaming video, the Web, SEO and PPC, blogs, Twitter, LinkedIn . . . .

But the fact is, the longer I stay in this business, the more I realize that in many cases, when a company uses technology to help them solve a problem, the most valuable part of the process isn’t the technology—it’s the reexamination of the process itself.

Sure, new technologies can make dazzling improvements to productivity, but it’s the insight gained by really focusing on the problem that often becomes the most valuable asset of change.

Sales consultant Dick Lee has a fabulous article that partially addresses this issue, stating that throwing technology at a problem without redesigning the process and attitudes surrounding its use is a near sure-bet failure.

So why are we so hesitant to address process?

• Because it’s uncomfortable.
• Because we have to actually change.
• Because it means we have to admit that we may have been wrong in the past.
• Because a lot of people have invested a lot of time, energy, and money into developing the current process.
• Because in some cases, changing a process means employees’ reputations are at stake.

As much as I want it to be true—because it’d mean my company would make a whole lot more money—simply throwing technology at a problem doesn’t inherently solve it. Confusing a technology problem with a process problem leads to costly, sometimes fatal mistakes.

So the next time you get pitched by a technology vendor with something that’s going to “revolutionize” your company, don’t necessarily be skeptical. Just make sure that you couldn’t solve the same problem by simply talking to Bob or Jill down in production, and making a clear, definable process change.

A few thoughts about Apple’s recent PR problems:

1. When your client has a real problem, simply telling them “You’re holding it wrong” isn’t a real solution.

Even if it’s the truth, clients and prospects rarely want to hear that their process is to blame. Even if it is actually part of the problem, be extremely careful and proceed with caution. A lot of people at the client’s organization have spent a lot of time and energy putting the current process in place.

2. As dense as the general public (read: your clients) often seem to be, they can tell when you’re pushing spin, and when you’re really trying to solve their problem.

You think that the G4′s buyers, many of whom had owned earlier iPhone iterations, were excited to hear that their brand new hardware had an engineering defect, only to have Apple saying to the press, “It’s no big deal, just buy our slip case for it!”? Ignoring a problem doesn’t make it go away, it just comes across as arrogance.

3. Be extremely cautious about what you treat as a “random outlier,” and what you treat as a real problem.

Bad news never travels well. You think the V.P. of production wanted to have a meeting and tell Steve Jobs, “Hey, um, I think there’s a problem with our antenna design?” How soon did Apple know they had a problem on their hands? Within the first 5,000 units sold? The first 25,000? First 50,000? (Some seem to think Steve Jobs showcasing the Apple slip covers during the product launch meant they knew about it all along.) One of the biggest problems that leads to disaster is the fact that employees don’t want to communicate bad news for fear of the consequences. If your employees don’t feel empowered enough, or trust management enough to let you know when you have a real problem, your corporate culture is in dire need of change.

4. If it’s real, own the problem.

The words “Yes, but . . . ” should never leave your lips until the problem is solved. Clients and prospects don’t want to hear about how amazing you were six or 12 months ago. Don’t point the finger at other vendors, or other people in the company. “Well, if So-and-so Technologies had made Widget X properly, we wouldn’t be having this problem.” It’s not their problem, it’s yours. Fix it.

5. When you definitively know there’s a problem, act decisively, act now, and tell your clients what you’re doing about it.
   1. What is Inside Sales? Our Definition of Inside Sales | Ken Krogue – 10,316 Views
   2. Inside Sales Best Practices | Ken Krogue - 893 Views
   3. KPI – Key Performance Indicators | Ken Krogue – 702 Views
   4. Inside Sales Tips by Ken Krogue | Ken Krogue - 653 Views
   5. Inside Sales versus Outside Sales | Ken Krogue – 316 Views
   6. 6 Reasons Salesforce Users Need Hosted Dialer Technology | Ken Krogue - 312 Views
   7. Is Leaving a Voicemail Worthwhile? | Ken Krogue – 305 Views
   8. Leadscon East Vendors Need to Drink their Own Medicine | Ken Krogue - 117 Views
   9. Behind the Cloud – Ken’s Notes | Ken Krogue – 239 Views
   10. Demand Generation Tactics and Strategy | Ken Krogue – 199 Views
   11. Inside Sales Tips – No Vacations Last Week of the Month | Ken Krogue – 177 Views
   12. Inside Sales Tips – Interest is The Counterfeit of Need | Ken Krogue – 149 Views
   13. Inside Sales Tips – Skip to the Beep | Ken Krogue – 134 Views
   14. Inside Sales Tips – How LinkedIn Gives you 3 Free SEO Backlinks | Ken Krogue - 134 Views
   15. Inside Sales is Top Method of Lead Generation | Ken Krogue - 125 Views

The worst thing you can do in a situation like Apple’s is to “circle the wagons” and go silent. Open channels of communication tells your clients that you’re more interested in actually fixing the problem than in trying to save face. Be proactive.

Top 15 Articles on www.KenKrogue.com